We couldn’t find any content because your search may be too narrow.
Consider broadening your search
psoriasiszap.comPsoriasis News Storm - Instagram, Jonathan Van Ness, Pool Fitness and DiscriminationJonathan Van Ness Talks Psoriasis, Skin Care, and Self-Acceptance Jonathan Van Ness is just one of many popular figures to come forward about their struggles with psoriasis. It always helps me to know that there [...]5
careers.orbium.comStrength in Diversity: Celebrating International Day for the Elimination of Racial DiscriminationOrbium commemorates International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination to celebrate diversity around the world. In Orbium, we improve ourselves through diversity to deliver the best solutions to clients.1
history.house.govRepresentative Winifred Stanley of New York | US House of Representatives: History, Art & ArchivesOn this date, during the 78th Congress (1943–1945), Congresswoman Winifred Stanley of New York introduced one of the early equal pay for equal work legislative attempts. Representative Stanley proposed an amendment to the National Labor Relations Act to make it unlawful “to discriminate against any employee, in the rate of compensation paid, on account of sex.” With millions of women entering the home front workforce during World War II, she wanted to maintain in “peacetime the drive and energy which women have contributed to the war effort” and further declared that, “we shall be paying only lip service to those glorious and fundamental guarantees of our nation's heritage.” After its introduction, the bill was referred to the Committee on Labor, where it eventually expired. Despite the efforts of the Congresswomen who followed Stanley, equal pay for equal work legislation languished in congressional committees. Finally, in 1963, with Edith Green of Oregon shepherding through the legislation, the Equal Pay for Equal Work Act became law. The bill decreed that no employer could pay a woman “at a rate less than the rate at which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex . . . on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions.” The law allowed wage differences based on factors such as seniority and merit.
artforum.comArtist Banu Cennetoğlu and The Guardian to Publish List of Refugee DeathsIn conjunction with her forthcoming exhibition at London’s Chisenhale Gallery, Banu Cennetoğlu is also facilitating the distribution of The List in The Guardian, in print and online on June 20, 2018, World Refugee Day.Compiled and updated each year by UNITED for Intercultural Action, an anti-discrimination network of 550 organizations in forty-eight countries, The List traces information relating to the deaths of 34,361 refugees and migrants who have lost their lives within, or on the borders of Europe since 1993 (last documented as of May 5, 2018).Since 2007, Cennetoğlu has facilitated versions
justice.govJustice Department Settles Immigration-Related Discrimination Claim Against Setpoint Systems Inc.The Justice Department today announced that it reached a settlement with Setpoint Systems Inc., an Ogden, Utah, engineering company. The settlement resolves the Department’s investigation into whether the company engaged in hiring discrimination against non-U.S. citizens protected under the Immigration and Nationality Act’s (INA) anti-discrimination provision.
alternet.orgSouth Carolina Governor Requested Exemption to Allow Foster-Care Agency to Discriminate Against Non-ChristiansHe personally intervened with the Department of Health and Human Services on behalf of Miracle Hill Ministries. In an unusual move, South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster, a long-standing ally of President Donald Trump, has personally intervened with the Department of Health and Human Services to secure a religious exemption from federal nondiscrimination laws for a Christian foster-care-placement agency in his state. Without the exemption, the placement agency, Miracle Hill Ministries, of Greenville, is at risk of losing its license because it refuses to place foster children with non-Christian families.
aclu.orgHow Police Can Stop Being Weaponized by Bias-Motivated 911 CallsToo often, law enforcement lets itself be hijacked by a biased call to 911 — usually a caller reporting a “suspicious person” who is actually just Black. In response to a spate of well-publicized incidents, many are saying that white people should avoid calling the police when an actual crime is not being committed. That’s a start. But police departments also need to retool how they respond to these calls.Black people and other people of color shouldn’t have to endure police intrusions that lack a legal basis. When police enforce the racial biases of private citizens, they convert those biases into governmental discrimination. Furthermore, such arrests undermine the legitimacy of the police and carry disturbing historical echoes of when the law explicitly relegated nonwhite people to second-class status. By enforcing the will of white people to exclude Black and brown people from public space and everyday activities, these officers recall the role of law enforcement in maintaining Jim Crow and, before that, slavery.Thanks to the internet and cellphones, the nation at large has seen numerous examples of police acting on the racial biases of those who called them.At a Starbucks in Philadelphia recently, a white manager called the cops on two Black men waiting for a business meeting, just minutes after they arrived at the coffee shop — the police responded by arresting the two men. In a Yale University dorm, a white graduate student called the cops on a Black graduate student for napping in a common room — the police responded by detaining the Black student for nearly 20 minutes before letting her back inside her own dorm room. At Colorado State University, a white woman on a campus tour called the cops on two Native American teens because they “just really stand out” from the others on the tour — the police responded by pulling these prospective students from the tour to interrogate them. HAVE YOU HAD THE POLICE CALLED ON YOU FOR RACIST OR INEXPLICABLE REASONS? SHARE YOUR STORY In each of these incidents, the police let the callers use them to weaponize the callers’ own biases, without exercising adequate independent judgment. That independent judgment begins with the dispatcher who answers the 911 call.Department policies should instruct dispatchers not to unthinkingly send officers to respond to questionable calls with minimal information. When, for example, a caller reports a “suspicious person,” the dispatcher should collect enough information to identify whether the caller has seen possible criminal activity that is worth an officer’s time to investigate. If it becomes clear that the caller is simply being racist rather than vague or inarticulate, the dispatcher should have the discretion to tell the caller that they will not dispatch an officer without a legitimate basis.That said, if they do decide to send an officer to the scene, the dispatcher should communicate information that lets the officer know of any concerns or reasons to take the reported facts with a grain of salt. A failure to pass along such information will necessarily expose people to serious risks.For example, in Tamir Rice’s case, if the dispatcher had communicated the caller’s belief that Rice was probably a minor and that the alleged gun was “probably fake,” Officer Timothy Loehmann might have taken time to investigate further instead of promptly shooting and killing a child for carrying a toy gun on a playground.Once dispatched, the responding officer also needs to exercise independent judgment. The officer should keep in mind that the caller’s statements may not be reliable, and that some people get perverse satisfaction from forcing others into an involuntary encounter with police. Indeed, making false 911 calls to sic a SWAT or SWAT-style law enforcement team on someone happens often enough that it has its own term: “swatting.”There is a better way.An incident in May in Tennessee shows how officers can defuse situations and protect people of color who are subjected to the frightening, often humiliating experience of being the subject of a racially motivated or otherwise unjustified call for police. A neighbor called the police on Michael Hayes, a Black real estate investor in Memphis, who was visiting a piece of property. After the police concluded the call was unfounded, they explained to the neighbor that Hayes had the right to be there and warned her not to interfere with his work. She responded by hurling invective at Hayes. At Hayes’ request, the officers stayed for a few minutes to make sure he was able to complete his work unmolested.By the end of the encounter, a surprised and relieved Hayes said, “The police, they were on my side.” This should be the rule, not the exception.Training police to resist enforcing other people’s biases is, of course, only a first step. Black and brown people should be able to trust the police to protect them when needed, while leaving them free to live their daily lives. To achieve equal justice, police policies and practices must prioritize the lives, dignity, and constitutional rights of all those they encounter. That starts with recognizing whether they’re responding to a crime or to someone who’s just afraid of Black people.HAVE YOU HAD THE POLICE CALLED ON YOU FOR RACIST OR INEXPLICABLE REASONS? SHARE YOUR STORYFrom Starbucks to Yale, the stories of racial profiling that have hit the news recently are disturbing — but they’re not isolated incidents. If you’re a person of color who’s had the police called on you for inexplicable or racist reasons, share your experiences and ideas through the link above. We may use your story in an evolving collection that we will feature on our website.